← 返回
安全合规 中文

Vulnerability Scanner

Performs static analysis for OWASP 2025 risks, supply chain threats, secrets detection, code patterns, and prioritizes vulnerabilities by exploitability and...
对 OWASP 2025 风险、供应链威胁、密钥检测、代码模式进行静态分析,并按可利用性优先排序漏洞。
brandonwise
安全合规 clawhub v1.0.0 1 版本 99947.4 Key: 无需
★ 0
Stars
📥 1,899
下载
💾 21
安装
1
版本
#latest

概述

Vulnerability Scanner

Advanced vulnerability analysis for OWASP 2025, supply chain security, attack surface mapping, and risk prioritization.

Description

USE WHEN:

  • Auditing code for security vulnerabilities
  • Reviewing dependencies for supply chain risks
  • Scanning for hardcoded secrets or credentials
  • Identifying dangerous code patterns (injection, XSS, deserialization)
  • Preparing for security audits or penetration tests
  • Prioritizing vulnerability remediation by risk

DON'T USE WHEN:

  • Need runtime dynamic analysis (use actual pentest tools)
  • Scanning compiled binaries (this is source-code focused)
  • Need compliance-specific audits (PCI-DSS, HIPAA have dedicated tools)

Scripts

ScriptPurposeUsage
------------------------
scripts/security_scan.pyFull security scan`python scripts/security_scan.py [--scan-type all\deps\secrets\patterns\config]`

Quick Start

# Full scan
python scripts/security_scan.py /path/to/project

# Just check for secrets
python scripts/security_scan.py /path/to/project --scan-type secrets

# Summary output
python scripts/security_scan.py /path/to/project --output summary

Reference Files

FilePurpose
---------------
checklists.mdOWASP Top 10, Auth, API, Data protection checklists

1. Security Expert Mindset

Core Principles

PrincipleApplication
------------------------
Assume BreachDesign as if attacker already inside
Zero TrustNever trust, always verify
Defense in DepthMultiple layers, no single point
Least PrivilegeMinimum required access only
Fail SecureOn error, deny access

Threat Modeling Questions

Before scanning, ask:

  1. What are we protecting? (Assets)
  2. Who would attack? (Threat actors)
  3. How would they attack? (Attack vectors)
  4. What's the impact? (Business risk)

2. OWASP Top 10:2025

Risk Categories

RankCategoryThink About
-----------------------------
A01Broken Access ControlWho can access what? IDOR, SSRF
A02Security MisconfigurationDefaults, headers, exposed services
A03Software Supply Chain 🆕Dependencies, CI/CD, build integrity
A04Cryptographic FailuresWeak crypto, exposed secrets
A05InjectionUser input → system commands
A06Insecure DesignFlawed architecture
A07Authentication FailuresSession, credential management
A08Integrity FailuresUnsigned updates, tampered data
A09Logging & AlertingBlind spots, no monitoring
A10Exceptional Conditions 🆕Error handling, fail-open states

2025 Key Changes

2021 → 2025 Shifts:
├── SSRF merged into A01 (Access Control)
├── A02 elevated (Cloud/Container configs)
├── A03 NEW: Supply Chain (major focus)
├── A10 NEW: Exceptional Conditions
└── Focus shift: Root causes > Symptoms

3. Supply Chain Security (A03)

Attack Surface

VectorRiskQuestion to Ask
-------------------------------
DependenciesMalicious packagesDo we audit new deps?
Lock filesIntegrity attacksAre they committed?
Build pipelineCI/CD compromiseWho can modify?
RegistryTyposquattingVerified sources?

Defense Principles

  • Verify package integrity (checksums)
  • Pin versions, audit updates
  • Use private registries for critical deps
  • Sign and verify artifacts

4. Attack Surface Mapping

What to Map

CategoryElements
--------------------
Entry PointsAPIs, forms, file uploads
Data FlowsInput → Process → Output
Trust BoundariesWhere auth/authz checked
AssetsSecrets, PII, business data

Prioritization Matrix

Risk = Likelihood × Impact

High Impact + High Likelihood → CRITICAL
High Impact + Low Likelihood  → HIGH
Low Impact + High Likelihood  → MEDIUM
Low Impact + Low Likelihood   → LOW

5. Risk Prioritization

CVSS + Context

FactorWeightQuestion
--------------------------
CVSS ScoreBase severityHow severe is the vuln?
EPSS ScoreExploit likelihoodIs it being exploited?
Asset ValueBusiness contextWhat's at risk?
ExposureAttack surfaceInternet-facing?

Prioritization Decision Tree

Is it actively exploited (EPSS >0.5)?
├── YES → CRITICAL: Immediate action
└── NO → Check CVSS
         ├── CVSS ≥9.0 → HIGH
         ├── CVSS 7.0-8.9 → Consider asset value
         └── CVSS <7.0 → Schedule for later

6. Exceptional Conditions (A10 - New)

Fail-Open vs Fail-Closed

ScenarioFail-Open (BAD)Fail-Closed (GOOD)
------------------------------------------------
Auth errorAllow accessDeny access
Parsing failsAccept inputReject input
TimeoutRetry foreverLimit + abort

What to Check

  • Exception handlers that catch-all and ignore
  • Missing error handling on security operations
  • Race conditions in auth/authz
  • Resource exhaustion scenarios

7. Scanning Methodology

Phase-Based Approach

1. RECONNAISSANCE
   └── Understand the target
       ├── Technology stack
       ├── Entry points
       └── Data flows

2. DISCOVERY
   └── Identify potential issues
       ├── Configuration review
       ├── Dependency analysis
       └── Code pattern search

3. ANALYSIS
   └── Validate and prioritize
       ├── False positive elimination
       ├── Risk scoring
       └── Attack chain mapping

4. REPORTING
   └── Actionable findings
       ├── Clear reproduction steps
       ├── Business impact
       └── Remediation guidance

8. Code Pattern Analysis

High-Risk Patterns

PatternRiskLook For
-------------------------
String concat in queriesInjection"SELECT * FROM " + user_input
Dynamic code executionRCEeval(), exec(), Function()
Unsafe deserializationRCEpickle.loads(), unserialize()
Path manipulationTraversalUser input in file paths
Disabled securityVariousverify=False, --insecure

Secret Patterns

TypeIndicators
-----------------
API Keysapi_key, apikey, high entropy
Tokenstoken, bearer, jwt
Credentialspassword, secret, key
CloudAWS_, AZURE_, GCP_ prefixes

9. Cloud Security Considerations

Shared Responsibility

LayerYou OwnProvider Owns
-------------------------------
Data
Application
OS/RuntimeDependsDepends
Infrastructure

Cloud-Specific Checks

  • IAM: Least privilege applied?
  • Storage: Public buckets?
  • Network: Security groups tightened?
  • Secrets: Using secrets manager?

10. Anti-Patterns

❌ Don't✅ Do
-----------------
Scan without understandingMap attack surface first
Alert on every CVEPrioritize by exploitability + asset
Ignore false positivesMaintain verified baseline
Fix symptoms onlyAddress root causes
Scan once before deployContinuous scanning
Trust third-party deps blindlyVerify integrity, audit code

11. Reporting Principles

Finding Structure

Each finding should answer:

  1. What? - Clear vulnerability description
  2. Where? - Exact location (file, line, endpoint)
  3. Why? - Root cause explanation
  4. Impact? - Business consequence
  5. How to fix? - Specific remediation

Severity Classification

SeverityCriteria
--------------------
CriticalRCE, auth bypass, mass data exposure
HighData exposure, privilege escalation
MediumLimited scope, requires conditions
LowInformational, best practice

> Remember: Vulnerability scanning finds issues. Expert thinking prioritizes what matters. Always ask: "What would an attacker do with this?"

版本历史

共 1 个版本

  • v1.0.0 当前
    2026-03-29 00:58 安全 安全

安全检测

腾讯云安全 (Keen)

安全,无风险
查看报告

腾讯云安全 (Sanbu)

安全,无风险
查看报告

🔗 相关推荐

security-compliance

OpenClaw Backup

alex3alex
备份与恢复 OpenClaw 数据。适用于创建备份、设置自动备份计划、从备份恢复或管理备份轮转。处理 ~/.openclaw 目录归档并包含适当的排除规则。
★ 89 📥 30,607
security-compliance

Skill Vetter

spclaudehome
AI智能体技能安全预审工具。安装ClawdHub、GitHub等来源技能前,检查风险信号、权限范围及可疑模式。
★ 1,215 📥 266,525
security-compliance

MoltGuard - Security & Antivirus & Guardrails

thomaslwang
MoltGuard — OpenClaw 安全守卫,由 OpenGuardrails 提供。安装 MoltGuard,保护您和您的用户免受提示注入、数据泄露和恶意攻击。
★ 116 📥 30,720