← 返回
未分类 中文

Trip Guide PDF Lodging

Research, plan, revise, and deliver lodging-anchored travel guides as HTML/PDF with verified route data, hotel selection, fallback hotel swaps, curated scree...
Research, plan, revise, and deliver lodging-anchored travel guides as HTML/PDF with verified route data, hotel selection, fallback hotel swaps, curated scree...
allensu0314
未分类 clawhub v1.0.0 1 版本 99626.9 Key: 无需
★ 0
Stars
📥 267
下载
💾 0
安装
1
版本
#latest

概述

Trip Guide PDF Lodging

Build the guide in HTML first. Export PDF only after route logic, lodging choice, and screenshots are stable.

Treat the hotel or lodging as the nightly anchor. Design each day around where the user sleeps, not around scenic spots alone.

Core rules

  1. Verify every hard number before writing it.
  2. Separate hard data from soft signal.
    • Hard data: driving time, distance, tolls, hotel address, phone, opening hours, scenic latest entry.
    • Soft signal: renovation quality, noise risk, dining feel, queue risk, convenience impressions.
  3. If lodging changes, recompute all dependent legs instead of text-replacing the hotel name.
  4. Keep screenshots sparse and purposeful.
  5. Use formal, compact copy unless the user explicitly wants casual tone.

Workflow

1) Lock the planning frame

Extract:

  • dates / trip length
  • departure city
  • trip style: self-drive, hiking, family, solo, etc.
  • preference weights: scenery, comfort, food, crowd avoidance, budget
  • output target: quick answer or polished HTML/PDF

If the user already gave enough constraints, start researching immediately.

2) Choose the lodging strategy first

Before writing the day plan, determine:

  • single hotel vs multi-hotel
  • town-center convenience vs scenic proximity
  • parking requirement
  • breakfast requirement if it changes departure time
  • fallback lodging in case of sellout or price spike

The day plan should follow the lodging choice, not the other way around.

3) Choose sources by job

Read references/source-selection.md when deciding what to trust.

Default split:

  • maps / official scenic pages / structured listings for hard numbers
  • review sites and social posts for soft signal
  • if Chinese travel/review sites are involved and normal search/fetch is weak, use cn-review-sites-cdp

4) Verify hard data before drafting

Check the numbers that decide feasibility:

  • origin → lodging
  • lodging → main scenic spot
  • lodging → secondary scenic spot
  • lodging → dinner / breakfast anchors when they matter in the final guide
  • scenic opening hours / latest entry
  • hotel phone / rating / address if shown

Re-run this step after every lodging change.

5) Design the itinerary from the lodging anchor

For each day, choose the nightly lodging first, then build:

  • arrival window
  • check-in / rest buffer
  • meal window
  • scenic entry window
  • return buffer
  • holiday congestion buffer

If the hotel moves from old town to new town, update the walking radius and dinner logic. Do not assume Day 1 still works unchanged.

6) Draft HTML first

Good structure:

  • cover / conclusion box
  • route overview
  • day-by-day plan
  • lodging section
  • dining section
  • risk notes / contingency

The top conclusion should tell the user:

  • which lodging won
  • why it won
  • what fallback exists
  • what tradeoff changed after the lodging decision

7) Use screenshots as evidence, not decoration

Keep only screenshots that support a decision:

  • scenic proof image
  • hotel listing / hotel note if it materially affects the recommendation
  • restaurant listing snippet if it justifies a recommendation

Reject screenshots that are blank, QR-heavy, cluttered, or mostly irrelevant UI.

8) Run the QA gate before PDF export

Read references/qa-checklist.md and clear it.

Minimum gate:

  • route numbers consistent with latest lodging choice
  • time logic feasible
  • screenshots clean
  • tone formal enough
  • filenames and variant names clear

9) Deliver and version clearly

Prefer scenario-specific filenames over destructive overwrites.

Examples:

  • *_final.html
  • *_revision.html
  • *_hotel-swap.html
  • *_quanji.html

When sending local files through OpenClaw messaging, prefer relative MEDIA:./... paths instead of absolute MEDIA:/abs/path paths.

Revision logic

  • Visual-only feedback: rework screenshots, typography, and tone.
  • Hotel change: recompute every dependent leg and rewrite the daily structure affected by that hotel.
  • Budget pressure: rerank hotels and surface tradeoffs explicitly.
  • Feasibility issue: re-verify with maps / official sources and rebuild affected days.

Read these references when needed

  • references/source-selection.md — which source to trust for which data type
  • references/qa-checklist.md — pre-export checklist for lodging-based guides

版本历史

共 1 个版本

  • v1.0.0 当前
    2026-05-07 21:44 安全 安全

安全检测

腾讯云安全 (Keen)

安全,无风险
查看报告

腾讯云安全 (Sanbu)

安全,无风险
查看报告

🔗 相关推荐

ai-agent

self-improving agent

pskoett
捕获经验教训、错误及修正内容,以实现持续改进。适用于以下场景:(1)命令或操作意外失败;(2)用户纠正Claude(如“不,那不对……”“实际上……”);(3)用户请求的功能不存在;(4)外部API或工具出现故障;(5)Claude发现自身
★ 4,078 📥 808,437
ai-agent

Self-Improving + Proactive Agent

ivangdavila
自我反思+自我批评+自我学习+自组织记忆。智能体评估自身工作、发现错误并持续改进。
★ 1,376 📥 320,164
dev-programming

Github

steipete
使用 `gh` CLI 与 GitHub 交互,通过 `gh issue`、`gh pr`、`gh run` 和 `gh api` 管理议题、PR、CI 运行及高级查询。
★ 675 📥 325,236