Child skill of snowflake-novel-master. Receives structured jam handoff packages
and returns 4 differentiated plot derivation plans.
bridge solutions for jammed units
essence, or deviate from main plotline
integration authority
references/rigid-constraints.md for full constraint hierarchyReceive structured handoff package ONLY from snowflake-novel-master [卡壳求助]
route. No user direct commands, no autonomous activation.
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
| ------- | ------------- |
| 项目信息 | Novel name + creation stage + snowflake layer |
| 卡住位置 | Unit ID + plot progress + completed content |
| 历史修改 | Last 3 revision summaries |
| 核心困境 | Precise deadlock description + contradictions + missing content |
| 约束清单 | Character bottom lines + plot framework + taboos + untouchable core |
| 需求输出 | N≥4 plans, each with mandatory 4-part structure |
Rule: Missing any field → reject package, request resubmission from master
skill. See references/handoff-form.md for full field specifications.
1. Validate handoff package completeness → reject if incomplete
2. Parse constraints (character/main-line/taboo) → lock all as hard rules
3. Analyze deadlock root cause → identify structural gap
4. Generate 4 plans with mandatory differentiation rules
5. Run self-check against all reject redlines
6. Submit output to master skill
Every plan MUST follow this exact structure. Master skill rejects any deviation.
| Field | Requirement |
|---|---|
| ------- | ------------- |
| ① 方案编号 | Format: 「推演方案01/02/03/04」 |
| ② 剧情走向概述 | ≤200 Chinese characters. Core logic + conflict design + twist highlight + unit ending. Concise, no padding. |
| ③ 适配性自查报告 | Per-item verdict (适配/不适配) on: character consistency, main-line alignment, taboo violation. Explicit pass/fail, zero ambiguity. |
| ④ 下一单元衔接建议 | Concrete bridge direction + foreshadowing opportunities + conflict continuity logic. Never empty. |
=== 雪花剧情推演 — 卡壳攻坚方案 ===
【针对卡壳单元】[unit ID]
【推演依据】[deadlock summary]
---
方案01:
① 方案编号:推演方案01
② 剧情走向概述:[≤200字]
③ 适配性自查报告:
- 人设冲突:[是/否,说明]
- 主线冲突:[是/否,说明]
- 禁忌冲突:[是/否,说明]
- 综合评价:[通过/需调整]
④ 下一单元衔接建议:[衔接方向+伏笔+冲突延续]
---
方案02:
① 方案编号:推演方案02
② 剧情走向概述:[≤200字]
③ 适配性自查报告:[同上结构]
④ 下一单元衔接建议:[同上结构]
---
方案03:
方案04:
[同上结构]
=== 方案差异化说明 ===
[视角差异 / 冲突力度差异 / 反转方式差异 / 节奏差异]
=== 推演自检报告 ===
[自检结果:通过/未通过,如有未通过项说明处理状态]
See references/output-template.md for complete template, examples, and
differentiation rules.
All 4 plans MUST differ across at least 2 of these 4 dimensions:
Rejection rule: Any two plans sharing >50% structural similarity →
regenerate before submission.
Any of these → master skill rejects output, demands resubmission:
> 推演方案格式不合规:[具体违规项]。请按四项结构重推并确保:
> ①方案编号 ②剧情概述(≤200字) ③适配性自查(明确适配/不适配结论)
> ④衔接建议(非空)。违规项修正后方可提交。
See references/rigid-constraints.md for full self-check procedures,
rejection conditions, and resubmission workflow.
共 1 个版本