← 返回
未分类

Skill Quality Auditor

Evaluate and score AgentSkills on design, content, security, and usability, producing a detailed numeric scorecard with improvement suggestions.
评估并对 AgentSkills 在设计、内容、安全性和可用性方面进行打分,生成详细的数值评分卡并提供改进建议。
ann0501 ann0501 来源
未分类 clawhub v1.0.0 1 版本 100000 Key: 无需
★ 0
Stars
📥 484
下载
💾 1
安装
1
版本
#latest

概述

Skill Reviewer

Four-dimension quality auditor for AgentSkills.

Review Process

Step 1: Inventory & Classify

  1. find /path/to/skill -type f — list all files. If path doesn't exist or is empty, abort with error.
  2. Read _meta.json or .clawhub/origin.json if present (source, version, author info).
  3. Read SKILL.md in full.
  4. Classify skill type per references/weight-adjustment.md → determine weights.

Step 2: Scan

  1. SKILL.md (full read)
  2. scripts/ (full read, do NOT execute)
  3. references/ (full read if ≤10 files or ≤50KB total; spot-check otherwise)
  4. assets/ (list filenames, flag non-asset file types: .sh/.py/.exe/.bat/.ps1 in assets/ = suspicious)
  5. Other files (.json, dotfiles, symlinks) — inspect each

Step 3: Score Each Dimension

Load reference files: references/design-quality.md, references/content-quality.md, references/security.md, references/usability.md.

For each dimension, walk the checklist and score per the rubric. Cite [file:line] for each finding.

Security shortcut: Run grep sweeps for CRITICAL patterns first (see security.md C1-C11). If any CRITICAL found → D3=1, note it, but still score remaining dimensions — don't skip them.

Orphan file check (security.md): After reading SKILL.md, cross-reference all mentioned files against the actual file list. Flag orphans.

Step 4: Calculate & Verdict

Weighted total = Σ(dim_score × adjusted_weight)

VerdictCondition
--------------------
✅ PASSTotal ≥ 8 AND every dimension ≥ 6 AND no CRITICAL findings
🔧 REVISETotal < 8 OR any dimension < 6 OR any CRITICAL finding

CRITICAL auto-revise: Even if total ≥ 8, any security CRITICAL finding forces REVISE.

Report Format

Use list format (not tables — compatible with all platforms):

PASS:

【技能审校通过】
技能:{name}
路径:{path}
类型:{type}
综合得分:{score}/10
审校日期:{date}

• 设计质量({w1}%):{d1}/10 — {简要说明}
• 内容质量({w2}%):{d2}/10 — {简要说明}
• 安全性({w3}%):{d3}/10 — {简要说明}
• 实用性({w4}%):{d4}/10 — {简要说明}

亮点:
- {亮点1}
- {亮点2}

REVISE:

【技能审校打回】
技能:{name}
路径:{path}
类型:{type}
综合得分:{score}/10
审校日期:{date}

⚠️ 判定维度:
• 设计质量({w1}%):{d1}/10
• 内容质量({w2}%):{d2}/10
• 安全性({w3}%):{d3}/10
• 实用性({w4}%):{d4}/10

具体问题:
- [D1] {issue} — {file}:{line}
- [D3] 🔴 CRITICAL: {issue} — {file}:{line}

改进方向:
- {方向1}
- {方向2}

达标标准:
- {标准1}
- {标准2}

References

  • references/weight-adjustment.md — type classification + weight matrix
  • references/design-quality.md — D1 checklist + rubric + scoring rules
  • references/content-quality.md — D2 checklist + rubric + scoring rules
  • references/security.md — D3 pattern table + detection commands
  • references/usability.md — D4 checklist + rubric + scoring rules

版本历史

共 1 个版本

  • v1.0.0 当前
    2026-05-03 05:37 安全 安全

安全检测

腾讯云安全 (Keen)

安全,无风险
查看报告

腾讯云安全 (Sanbu)

安全,无风险
查看报告

🔗 相关推荐

ai-agent

Self-Improving + Proactive Agent

ivangdavila
自我反思+自我批评+自我学习+自组织记忆。智能体评估自身工作、发现错误并持续改进。
★ 1,406 📥 324,295
ai-agent

Agent Browser

rez0
用于 AI 代理的浏览器自动化 CLI。当用户需要与网站交互(包括浏览页面、填写表单、点击按钮、截图等)时使用。
★ 843 📥 321,560
ai-agent

Find Skills

guipi888
场景驱动+关键词双模式技能发现工具。当用户用自然语言描述场景/需求(如"我想做一个海报""帮我分析股票"),或明确说"安装技能/find skills/找个skill"时,自动从官方内置、本地已安装、SkillHub、虾评、GitHub、C
★ 1,488 📥 551,951