← 返回
数据分析 中文

Shadows Bug Hunter

Structured debugging with 4 techniques — Log Injection, Screenshot Analysis, Manual Trace, Test-Driven Fix. Use when facing errors, broken UI, regressions, o...
**结构化调试四法:日志注入、截图分析、手动追踪、测试驱动修复。** 适用于报错、UI异常、功能回归等场景。
nakedoshadow
数据分析 clawhub v1.1.0 1 版本 99820.1 Key: 无需
★ 0
Stars
📥 555
下载
💾 14
安装
1
版本
#latest

概述

Bug Hunter — Structured Debugging Protocol

Version: 1.1.0 | Author: Shadows Company | License: MIT


WHEN TO TRIGGER

  • Runtime errors, exceptions, stack traces
  • UI rendering issues or visual bugs
  • Regression after recent changes
  • User says "debug", "fix this bug", "it's broken", "not working"
  • Test failures with unclear root cause
  • Performance degradation

WHEN NOT TO TRIGGER

  • Feature requests (use brainstorming skill)
  • Code style / formatting issues
  • Simple typos with obvious fix

PREREQUISITES

Required:

  • git — Used in Triage step to inspect recent changes via git log --oneline -10. Detection: which git or git --version.

Optional (auto-detected per project):

  • pytest — Python test runner, used in Technique 4. Detected via python -m pytest --version or presence of pytest.ini / pyproject.toml [tool.pytest].
  • jest — JavaScript test runner, used in Technique 4. Detected via npx jest --version or presence of jest.config.*.
  • vitest — Vite-based test runner, used in Technique 4. Detected via npx vitest --version or presence of vitest.config.*.

If no test runner is detected, Technique 4 (Test-Driven Fix) is limited to writing the test file — execution must be deferred.


PROTOCOL — 4 TECHNIQUES

Before choosing a technique, run Triage first:

Triage (MANDATORY — 60 seconds max)

  1. Read the error message completely — what does it actually say?
  2. When did it start? Check recent git changes: git log --oneline -10
  3. Is it reproducible? Try the failing action once
  4. Classify severity: Crash / Wrong result / Visual / Performance

Based on triage, select the most appropriate technique:


Technique 1 — LOG INJECTION (Best for: backend, data flow, async issues)

  1. Add strategic console.log / print() at key decision points
  2. Log inputs AND outputs of suspected functions
  3. Run the failing scenario
  4. Read logs to identify where expected != actual
  5. Fix the root cause
  6. CLEANUP: Remove ALL debug logs before committing
[LOG] function_name() called with: {params}
[LOG] function_name() returned: {result}
[LOG] condition_check: variable = {value}

> WARNING: This technique temporarily modifies source files. All injected debug code MUST be removed before any commit. See CLEANUP GUARANTEE below.

Technique 2 — SCREENSHOT ANALYSIS (Best for: UI bugs, layout issues)

  1. Capture or describe the current (broken) state
  2. Identify what SHOULD be displayed vs what IS displayed
  3. Inspect the component tree top-down
  4. Check: CSS specificity, z-index, overflow, flexbox/grid alignment
  5. Fix the styling or rendering logic
  6. Verify at breakpoints: 375px, 768px, 1024px, 1440px

Technique 3 — MANUAL TRACE (Best for: logic errors, algorithm bugs)

  1. Read the failing function line by line
  2. Manually compute expected values at each step
  3. Identify the exact line where expectation diverges from reality
  4. Check edge cases: null, undefined, empty array, zero, negative
  5. Fix the logic and add a test for the edge case

Technique 4 — TEST-DRIVEN FIX (Best for: regressions, complex interactions)

  1. Write a failing test that reproduces the bug FIRST
  2. Run the test to confirm it fails: python -m pytest {test_file} -x -q or npx jest {test_file} or npx vitest run {test_file}
  3. Fix the code until the test passes (green)
  4. Run the full test suite to check for regressions: python -m pytest -x -q or npx jest or npx vitest run
  5. Refactor if needed (refactor)

> NOTE: Technique 4 executes the project's test suite, which runs repository code. Only use on trusted repositories or within a sandboxed environment.


PROCESS

TRIAGE → SELECT TECHNIQUE → INVESTIGATE → HYPOTHESIZE → FIX → VERIFY → CLEANUP

Verification Checklist (after fix)

  • [ ] The original bug is fixed
  • [ ] No new errors introduced
  • [ ] Existing tests still pass
  • [ ] Debug artifacts removed (logs, console.log, print, TODO)
  • [ ] Edge cases covered

CLEANUP GUARANTEE

After every fix, the agent MUST perform a final verification pass:

  1. Search modified files for debug markers: grep -n "\\[LOG\\]\|console\\.log\|print(\|debugger\|# DEBUG\|// DEBUG" {modified_files}
  2. Remove any remaining debug artifacts
  3. Confirm the working tree is clean of injected debug code before reporting completion

This step is non-negotiable and applies to all techniques, not just Technique 1.


RULES

  1. Read before guessing — always read the actual error, never assume
  2. One fix at a time — change ONE thing, test, repeat
  3. Root cause, not symptoms — fix WHY it broke, not just the surface
  4. No shotgun debugging — don't change random things hoping it works
  5. Clean up — remove ALL debug code before committing
  6. Regression test — add a test to prevent the same bug from returning

SECURITY CONSIDERATIONS

  • Commands executed: git log (read-only). Technique 4 runs project test suites (pytest, jest, vitest) which execute repository code.
  • Data read: Source files in the local repository.
  • File modification: Technique 1 (Log Injection) temporarily modifies source files to inject debug statements. All injected code MUST be removed before commit (see CLEANUP GUARANTEE).
  • Network access: None.
  • Persistence: None.
  • Credentials: None required.
  • Sandboxing: Recommended when using Technique 4 on untrusted repositories, as test execution runs arbitrary project code.

OUTPUT FORMAT

## Bug Report
- **Error**: [exact error message]
- **Severity**: [Crash/Wrong Result/Visual/Performance]
- **Reproducible**: [Yes/No + steps]

## Root Cause
[Explanation of why the bug occurs]

## Fix Applied
[Description of the fix with file:line references]

## Verification
- [x] Original bug resolved
- [x] Tests pass
- [x] No debug artifacts remain

Published by Shadows Company — "We work in the shadows to serve the Light."

版本历史

共 1 个版本

  • v1.1.0 当前
    2026-03-30 15:54 安全 安全

安全检测

腾讯云安全 (Keen)

安全,无风险
查看报告

腾讯云安全 (Sanbu)

安全,无风险
查看报告

🔗 相关推荐

data-analysis

Excel / XLSX

ivangdavila
创建、检查和编辑 Microsoft Excel 工作簿及 XLSX 文件,支持可靠的公式、日期、类型、格式、重算及模板保留功能。
★ 368 📥 140,438
data-analysis

Data Analysis

ivangdavila
{"answer":"数据分析与可视化。查询数据库、生成报告、自动化电子表格,将原始数据转化为清晰可行的见解。适用于:(1) 您……"}
★ 198 📥 65,105
security-compliance

Shadows Security Scanner

nakedoshadow
七阶段安全审计流程——信息收集、依赖扫描、应用测试、API安全、加固检查、OWASP验证、报告。在生产前使用。
★ 0 📥 920