OpenClaw Consensus

Use this skill when the user explicitly wants a bounded cross-model deliberation on one brief.

What this skill does

• runs the same brief through 2-4 explicitly selected API-backed models from the active OpenClaw-configured pool
• preserves round-1 and round-2 artifacts on disk
• asks the current session model to write the final synthesis

Do not use this skill when

• the user wants casual chat or a single quick answer
• the user did not agree to explicit model selection yet
• the request is framed as replacing a lawyer, accountant, doctor, engineer, or other expert

Required inputs

Before running, confirm all of these:

1. one final brief
2. an explicit model shortlist of at least 2 models
3. an optional run label if the user wants one

Model rules

• In this MVP, the model shortlist is required.
• Only use models that appear in node {baseDir}/src/cli.mjs models.
• Do not silently substitute a missing or failing model.
• Do not use ollama/* models in this repo's MVP.

Invocation flow

1. If needed, inspect the configured model pool:

```bash

node {baseDir}/src/cli.mjs models

```

1. Run the consensus flow with the brief, explicit model list, and the current session model as orchestrator:

```bash

node {baseDir}/src/cli.mjs run --brief "" --models "openai-codex/gpt-5.4,openai-codex/gpt-5.5" --orchestrator-model "" --label "optional-label"

```

1. Read back the generated final.md and run.json before summarizing for the user.

Output expectations

Read the final synthesis carefully and present it truthfully:

• consensus
• disagreements
• unresolved uncertainty
• escalation points
• best overall synthesis

Safety rules

• Preserve disagreement; do not flatten it in your summary.
• Consensus is not proof of correctness.
• Keep expert-escalation language narrow and honest.
• If the CLI reports a fallback or unavailable selected model, stop and surface the failure clearly instead of improvising around it.