← 返回
效率工具
根据你的要求总结资讯摘要
Researches news and factual information on the web, then produces a cited, deduplicated summary tailored to constraints (topic, time range, region, sources,...
在网络上搜索新闻和事实信息,然后根据约束条件(主题、时间范围、地域、来源等)生成带引用的、去重的摘要。
darinouyang
效率工具
clawhub
v1.0.1 1 版本 100000 Key: 无需
#latest
概述
版本历史 (1)
安全
概述
News Research & Summary Quick start (do this every time) Clarify requirements from the user prompt; if missing, assume sensible defaults: Topic + scope, time window, region/language, target audience, desired length, and what counts as “可信来源”. Default time window: last 7 days unless user specifies otherwise. Default output language: match the user’s language. Create a search plan (3–8 queries) that covers: Primary keywords + synonyms + entities (people/orgs/products). Time constraint using the current year. “official / announcement / press release / regulator / filing” variants when relevant. Use web search to collect sources, prioritizing: Primary sources (official sites, regulators, standards bodies, court docs, academic publishers). Reputable secondary sources (major newsrooms, established trade press). Triangulate: For every key claim, confirm with ≥2 independent sources when possible. If only 1 source exists, label it explicitly as “single-source”. Deduplicate: Merge rewrites of the same story; keep the earliest/most primary source as the lead citation. Summarize with citations: Every bullet that contains a factual claim must include at least one source link. Use markdown links; avoid bare URLs. Output format (always use this template) ## 结论摘要(<= 120 字)
<高密度结论;点出最重要的 1–3 个变化>
## 关键要点
- **要点 1**:<一句话>([来源A](...), [来源B](...))
- **要点 2**:<一句话>([来源](...))
- **要点 3**:<一句话>([来源](...))
## 详情(按主题/时间线)
### <主题或日期>
- <事实 + 影响/背景>([来源](...))
## 影响评估(可选)
- **对谁有影响**:<受影响对象>
- **可能的下一步**:<推演,标注为推测/判断,不当作事实>
## 来源清单
1. <来源标题> — <机构/媒体>(YYYY-MM-DD)[链接](...)
2. ...
## 检索说明(简短)
- **时间范围**:<用户指定或默认>
- **检索关键词**:<3–8 条>
- **筛选标准**:<例如:官方优先/英文优先/地区限制等>
Quality & safety rules Do not invent sources or quotes. If dates/numbers conflict across sources, report the discrepancy and cite both. Separate fact vs analysis: Facts: must be cited. Analysis/judgment: label clearly as “分析/判断/推测”. Prefer direct citations to the original document over aggregator reposts. When requirements are underspecified (default behavior) If the user says “按要求检索资讯并总结” but provides no constraints: Ask up to 3 targeted questions only if needed to avoid wrong scope. Otherwise proceed with defaults (last 7 days, global, bilingual query set, 8–12 sources). Additional resources For search query patterns, source credibility heuristics, and citation practices, read reference.md . For example prompts and ideal outputs, read examples.md .
版本历史
共 1 个版本
v1.0.1
当前
2026-03-29 23:01 安全 安全
安全检测
腾讯云安全 (Sanbu)
安全,无风险
查看报告
🔗 相关推荐
productivity
steipete
获取当前天气和预报(无需API密钥)
★ 445
📥 226,299
productivity
ivangdavila
创建、检查和编辑 Microsoft Word 文档及 DOCX 文件,支持样式、编号、修订记录、表格、分节符及兼容性检查等功能。
★ 438
📥 147,655
productivity
steipete
使用nano-pdf CLI通过自然语言指令编辑PDF
★ 275
📥 114,844