← 返回
未分类

Multi-Perspective Forum

Run a structured multi-perspective debate in a single LLM call. Five hardcoded viewpoints argue across three rounds to eliminate confirmation bias and produc...
在一次 LLM 调用中运行结构化的多视角辩论。五个硬编码视角进行三轮辩论,以消除确认偏见并产出...
dodge1218 dodge1218 来源
未分类 clawhub v1.0.0 1 版本 100000 Key: 无需
★ 0
Stars
📥 288
下载
💾 0
安装
1
版本
#latest

概述

Agent Forum

One prompt. Five simulated agents. Three rounds. One verdict. Runs as a single sessions_spawn call (~8-12k tokens).

The 5 Agents

AgentPerspective
--------------------
Revenue RealistNo revenue signal = not working. Show me the money.
BuilderShip more, measure later. Momentum matters.
SkepticProve it. What's the null hypothesis? Assumes failure until evidence.
OperatorSystems, reliability, cost. What breaks at 10x scale?
Customer VoiceWould I open this email? Pay for this? Care about this?

Prompt Template

Inject {DATA} and {QUESTION} into this template:

You are running a strategic forum with 5 agents. Each agent has a hardcoded perspective.
They debate the data in 3 rounds, then produce a joint verdict.

RULES:
- 2-3 sentences per agent per round. No fluff.
- Agents MUST disagree where perspectives conflict.
- Round 3: CONSENSUS, CONTESTED, VERDICT.
- Brutally honest. No cheerleading.
- Total output under 3,000 tokens.

THE 5 AGENTS:
1. Revenue Realist — Only money. No revenue signal = not working.
2. Builder — Ship more, iterate. Momentum > perfection.
3. Skeptic — Prove it. Assumes failure until evidence.
4. Operator — Systems, reliability, cost. What breaks at scale?
5. Customer Voice — Would I buy/open/care about this?

DATA PAYLOAD:
{DATA}

QUESTION:
{QUESTION}

FORMAT:
## Round 1: Initial Positions
## Round 2: Challenges & Rebuttals
## Round 3: Verdict
### Consensus
### Contested
### Verdict
### Controllable Assessment
[Each item: ✅ Controllable / ⚠️ Partial / ❌ Uncontrollable]

Spawn Config

sessions_spawn:
  task: [formatted prompt]
  model: "github-copilot/claude-opus-4.6"
  mode: "run"
  runTimeoutSeconds: 120

Data Collection Before Forum

Leverage Audit (Monday): Resend analytics, lead pipeline counts, revenue/signups, error logs, outreach totals, cron health, cost burn.

Weekly Retro (Friday): Sprint target vs actual, emails sent, leads sourced, revenue events, things shipped/broke, blockers hit.

Cron

  • Monday 9 AM ET: 0 13 1 (leverage audit)
  • Friday 9 AM ET: 0 13 5 (retro)

Use OpenClaw cron (needs LLM access), not crontab.

版本历史

共 1 个版本

  • v1.0.0 当前
    2026-05-07 22:08 安全 安全

安全检测

腾讯云安全 (Keen)

安全,无风险
查看报告

腾讯云安全 (Sanbu)

安全,无风险
查看报告

🔗 相关推荐

ai-agent

Self-Improving + Proactive Agent

ivangdavila
自我反思+自我批评+自我学习+自组织记忆。智能体评估自身工作、发现错误并持续改进。
★ 1,403 📥 323,953
dev-programming

Rate Limit Guard

dodge1218
防止429重试循环和令牌浪费。在昂贵的API调用前或触发速率限制后使用。强制执行预检、退避和上下文收缩。
★ 0 📥 539
ai-agent

self-improving agent

pskoett
捕获经验教训、错误及修正内容,以实现持续改进。适用于以下场景:(1)命令或操作意外失败;(2)用户纠正Claude(如“不,那不对……”“实际上……”);(3)用户请求的功能不存在;(4)外部API或工具出现故障;(5)Claude发现自身
★ 4,119 📥 839,678