← 返回
未分类 中文

Monolith Modularization

Deep workflow for evolving monoliths—mapping domains, defining module seams, strangler patterns, data ownership, incremental extraction, and testing/deployme...
演进单体架构的深度工作流——领域映射、模块边界划定、绞杀者模式、数据所有权、增量提取及测试部署...
mikeclaw007 mikeclaw007 来源
未分类 clawhub v1.0.0 1 版本 100000 Key: 无需
★ 0
Stars
📥 364
下载
💾 0
安装
1
版本
#latest

概述

Monolith Modularization (Deep Workflow)

Modularize before microservice splintering when possible: clear internal APIs and data boundaries lower risk than distributed rewrites.

When to Offer This Workflow

Trigger conditions:

  • Tangled code; long build/test times; fear of changes
  • Preparing for extract services later
  • Team parallelism blocked by merge conflicts

Initial offer:

Use six stages: (1) map current state, (2) define target modules, (3) enforce boundaries, (4) migrate data & calls incrementally, (5) extract candidates, (6) validate & iterate. Confirm language ecosystem (Java modules, packages, etc.).


Stage 1: Map Current State

Goal: Dependency graph and pain hotspots.

Activities

  • Categorize by domain (feature areas)
  • Identify shared DB tables across features
  • Build ownership per directory package

Exit condition: Simple diagram or list of coupling edges.


Stage 2: Define Target Modules

Goal: Bounded contexts as packages or layers with explicit APIs.

Practices

  • Public API surface per module; internal packages hidden
  • Dependency rule: feature core allowed; not feature feature (eventually)

Exit condition: Rule document (lint or arch tests when possible).


Stage 3: Enforce Boundaries

Goal: Tooling backs intent (ArchUnit, dependency-cruiser, eslint boundaries).

Practices

  • CI fails on new violations (ratchet)
  • Gradual allowlist until legacy cleaned

Stage 4: Incremental Migration

Goal: Strangler inside the monolith: new code behind facades.

Patterns

  • Extract interface + impl swap later
  • Outbox table for events before Kafka exists

Exit condition: No big-bang rewrite without feature flags.


Stage 5: Extract Candidates

Goal: Choose first service by clear data ownership and low coupling.

Heuristics

  • Stable API already emerged internally
  • Different scaling needs or release cadence

Stage 6: Validate & Iterate

Goal: Metrics: build time, test time, defect rate per module.

Practices

  • Retros on boundary pain; adjust modules

Final Review Checklist

  • [ ] Domain map and coupling understood
  • [ ] Target module boundaries and public APIs defined
  • [ ] Enforcement (lint/tests) in CI where feasible
  • [ ] Incremental migration path without big-bang
  • [ ] Extraction candidates prioritized with rationale

Tips for Effective Guidance

  • Shared DB rows are the hardest couplingplan migrations early.
  • “Anti-corruption” layer when integrating legacy subdomains.
  • Modular monolith often beats premature microservices.

Handling Deviations

  • Rails / Django / Spring: map to packaging and engines / modules specifically.
  • Tiny codebase: folder structure + import rules only.

版本历史

共 1 个版本

  • v1.0.0 当前
    2026-03-31 09:47 安全 安全

安全检测

腾讯云安全 (Keen)

安全,无风险
查看报告

腾讯云安全 (Sanbu)

安全,无风险
查看报告

🔗 相关推荐

knowledge-management

Capcut

mikeclaw007
整理CapCut官网公开的模板类型、编辑功能、导出规格、版权说明及套餐信息,提供官方帮助文档汇总。
★ 2 📥 1,110
dev-programming

Mcporter

steipete
使用 mcporter CLI 直接列出、配置、认证及调用 MCP 服务器/工具(支持 HTTP 或 stdio),涵盖临时服务器、配置编辑及 CLI/类型生成功能。
★ 198 📥 68,263
dev-programming

Github

steipete
使用 `gh` CLI 与 GitHub 交互,通过 `gh issue`、`gh pr`、`gh run` 和 `gh api` 管理议题、PR、CI 运行及高级查询。
★ 686 📥 331,261