← 返回
未分类 Key 中文

Linkedin Comment Drafter

Drafts 1-3 tailored, high-engagement LinkedIn comment options from a post URL using proven 2026 templates and awaits user approval before posting.
根据帖子链接,使用2026验证模板起草1-3条高互动领英评论,等待用户批准后发布。
sergebulaev sergebulaev 来源
未分类 clawhub v1.0.0 1 版本 100000 Key: 需要
★ 0
Stars
📥 293
下载
💾 0
安装
1
版本
#latest#linkedin#marketing#social-media

概述

LinkedIn Comment Drafter

Produce conversation-provoking comments on any LinkedIn post from a URL. The skill targets the patterns that actually got author replies in 2026 testing (Kevin Payne / Ivan Tsybaev patterns) and avoids the thesis-restatement patterns that die with zero engagement.

When to use

  • User pastes a LinkedIn post URL and says "comment on this", "draft me a comment", "engage with this post"
  • User wants to be among the first 3 commenters on a viral post
  • User wants to reply to a closing question the author asked

Input

A LinkedIn post URL in any of the standard shapes (see the top-level SKILL.md URL table).

Output

1-3 draft comment variants, each with:

  • 200-350 char body, 1-2 short paragraphs, no em dashes, no hashtags
  • Assigned reaction type: LIKE, PRAISE, EMPATHY, INTEREST, APPRECIATION, or ENTERTAINMENT
  • Pattern label (which of the 7 templates was used)
  • Estimated engagement fit based on what the author typically responds to

Then waits for user approval. On "post", calls Publora to react + comment.

Steps

  1. Parse the URL. Use lib.url_parser.parse_linkedin_url to get post_urn and, if present, the post's activity ID.
  2. Fetch the post body. If HarvestAPI is available via corporate-knowledge/personal/knowledge/tools/social_poster/src/harvest_client.py, pull the post text and top 3 existing comments (to avoid duplicate takes). If not, ask the user to paste the post text.
  3. Detect the author's closing question. If the post ends with a "?" line, the Answer-the-Closing-Question template usually wins.
  4. Draft comment variants. Pick 2-3 templates from references/comment-templates.md that fit the post's topic. Fill them with user-voice phrasing.
  5. Run the humanizer pass. Strip em dashes, AI vocab, uniform sentence rhythm. Add a specific number or named entity if missing.
  6. Present drafts for approval using lib.approval.render_approval_card. Include: target URL, each variant, reaction suggestion, a one-line "why this template fits".
  7. On approval — adapt to the active backend. Call lib.active_backend():
    • publora (PUBLORA_API_KEY set) → react to the post with the chosen reaction type, pause 8-15s, then post via lib.PubloraClient.create_comment (top-level, no parent_comment). Return the comment URN.
    • manual (no backend configured — the default) → output the approved draft via lib.manual_mode_message(draft_text, target_url, kind="comment"). This gives the user a copy-paste block plus a one-time setup prompt for Publora (the preferred auto-post path). Do NOT attempt to post programmatically.
    • diy (LINKEDIN_SKILLS_CUSTOM_POSTER set) → invoke the user's configured custom poster command with the draft text + target URL as arguments.

Templates (see references/comment-templates.md for full list)

  • T1 Missing-Piece (Kevin Payne pattern, highest hit rate): [Name] the [their-thesis] argument misses one piece.. [what-moved]. when [their-condition], the real differentiator is [specific-skill], not [their-focus].
  • T2 Answer-the-Closing-Question: direct answer + one concrete example + why it matters
  • T3 Data-First: half the [population] I see now [behavior]. the [old-assumption] broke around [date]. [new-rule].
  • T4 Practitioner Observation: when X the system does Y, when X' it does Y'. that's when [outcome] kicks in.
  • T5 Counter-with-Concession: agree on point 1, push back on point 2 with one rooted reason
  • T6 Quotable-Reframe: one line under 12 words + expansion
  • T7 Ask-a-Sharper-Question: the harder version of this question is..

Hard rules

  • 200-350 chars. Don't exceed.
  • Always capitalize the author's name (e.g., "Dharmesh", not "dharmesh").
  • No em dashes, no hashtags, no emoji unless the post itself uses them.
  • No mention of the user's own product by name. Describe what they do instead.
  • Never paste generic praise ("Great post!", "This.", "100%"). The skill refuses.
  • Skip the comment if the post is sponsored, a generic listicle, or the author has already deleted it.

Example invocation

> User: "Comment on this: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/dharmesh_activity-7448808898326654978-iW20"

>

> Skill: [parses URL, fetches post, detects closing question "Seen this in your market?", drafts 3 variants]

>

> Skill returns: T2 Answer-the-Closing-Question variant as primary pick, with T1 Missing-Piece as backup, reaction INTEREST, one-line rationale, and approval prompt.

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md — this file
  • references/comment-templates.md — the 7 templates with fill-in slots and real examples
  • references/voice-rules.md — the specific voice rules from user feedback memories

Related skills

  • linkedin-reply-handler — if you're replying to a comment (not posting top-level)
  • linkedin-humanizer — for aggressive AI-tell scrubbing
  • linkedin-hook-extractor — if you want to use the author's own hook as the basis for your reply

版本历史

共 1 个版本

  • v1.0.0 当前
    2026-05-07 21:39 安全 安全

安全检测

腾讯云安全 (Keen)

安全,无风险
查看报告

腾讯云安全 (Sanbu)

安全,无风险
查看报告

🔗 相关推荐

content-creation

Humanizer

biostartechnology
消除AI写作痕迹,使文本更自然真实。基于维基百科"AI写作特征"指南,识别并修正夸张象征、宣传用语、肤浅-ing分析、模糊归因、破折号滥用、三项排比、AI词汇、负面平行结构及冗长连接词等模式。
★ 925 📥 210,544
content-creation

humanizer-zh

liuxy951129-cpu
去除文本中的 AI 生成痕迹。适用于编辑或审阅文本,使其听起来更自然、更像人类书写。 基于维基百科的"AI 写作特征"综合指南。检测并修复以下模式:夸大的象征意义、 宣传性语言、以 -ing 结尾的肤浅分析、模糊的归因、破折号过度使用、三段
★ 64 📥 30,353
content-creation

Marketing Mode

thesethrose
{"answer":"营销模式整合23项全能技能,涵盖策略、心理、内容、SEO、转化优化及付费增长。适用于营销策略、文案、SEO、转化优化、付费广告及各类营销战术需求。"}
★ 162 📥 25,258