← 返回
未分类

Learnloop

Continuous learning protocol for Claude — captures corrections, errors, and user preferences into native auto-memory so the next session remembers. Stop teac...
持续学习协议——将纠正、错误和用户偏好捕获到原生自动记忆中,以便下次会话记住。
jiajiaoy jiajiaoy 来源
未分类 clawhub v1.0.0 1 版本 100000 Key: 无需
★ 1
Stars
📥 236
下载
💾 0
安装
1
版本
#latest

概述

LearnLoop

Claude forgets everything between sessions by default. LearnLoop closes that loop — every correction, every error, every preference is captured into Claude Code's native auto-memory and auto-loaded next time.

The Core Problem

Without persistent learning, every session starts from zero:

  • You correct Claude → it agrees → next session, same mistake
  • You explain your role and preferences → gone tomorrow
  • A command fails with a known fix → re-debugged from scratch
  • An external tool has a gotcha → relearned on every encounter
  • You discover a better approach → never reused

The result: smart in the moment, amnesic over time. Your time is spent re-teaching, not advancing.

Why Native Memory

LearnLoop writes directly to Claude Code's auto-memory system at ~/.claude/projects//memory/:

  • Auto-injected — MEMORY.md is loaded into every new session, no manual recall needed
  • Typed — entries are classified (user / feedback / project / reference) so retrieval is sharp
  • Linked — memories cross-reference via [[slug]] for graph-style recall
  • Local — nothing leaves your machine

No .learnings/ folder to maintain, no separate file to read, no "did I check the log?" overhead.

When to Activate

Trigger LearnLoop on any of these moments:

TriggerSave AsExample
---------------------------
User corrects Claude ("No, that's wrong", "Actually...")feedback"Don't use git add . — too broad"
Command or tool fails unexpectedlyproject or feedback"npm test requires Node 20+ in this repo"
User shares role, expertise, or preferenceuser"Senior backend dev, new to React"
External system referencedreference"Bugs tracked in Linear project INGEST"
Knowledge turned out to be outdatedfeedback"API moved from v1 to v2 in March"
Better approach discovered for recurring taskfeedback"Use rg not grep — 10x faster in this monorepo"
Project deadline or constraint mentionedproject"Mobile freeze starts 2026-03-05"

If you'd otherwise say "I'll keep that in mind for next time" — that's the trigger. You can't keep it in mind. Save it.

The Protocol

Step 1: Detect the Trigger

Watch for the seven moments above. The two strongest signals:

  • User uses corrective language: "no", "actually", "wrong", "stop", "don't"
  • Validated success on a non-obvious choice: user accepts an unusual approach without pushback ("yes exactly", "perfect")

Save from failure AND success. Saving only corrections produces a fearful agent; saving validated wins keeps you bold.

Step 2: Classify the Memory Type

TypeUse For
---------------
userRole, expertise, goals, communication preferences
feedbackBehavioral rules: do this, don't do that, why
projectOngoing initiatives, deadlines, who/why context
referencePointers to external systems (Linear, Grafana, Slack channels)

If unsure, ask: does this guide my future behavior? (feedback) or describe a person? (user) or a workstream? (project) or point elsewhere? (reference).

Step 3: Write the Memory File

Path: ~/.claude/projects//memory/.md

Frontmatter format:

---
name: short-kebab-slug
description: one-line summary, specific enough to judge relevance later
metadata:
  type: feedback
---

Body structure for feedback and project types — lead with the rule/fact, then:

  • Why: the reason (often a past incident or stated preference)
  • How to apply: when this guidance kicks in

The Why is load-bearing. Without it, future-you can't judge edge cases — you'll either follow blindly or ignore stale rules.

Step 4: Update MEMORY.md Index

MEMORY.md is the index loaded into every session. One line per entry, under ~150 chars:

- [Title](slug.md) — one-line hook on when it matters

Keep it under 200 lines. If MEMORY.md fills up, consolidate related entries into single files rather than truncating.

Step 5: Verify Before Recalling

Memories age. Before acting on a recalled fact:

  • Names a file path? Check it exists.
  • Names a function or flag? grep for it.
  • Summarizes repo state? Prefer git log over the snapshot.

If the memory conflicts with current reality, update or delete the memory. Don't act on stale memory.

What NOT to Save

These belong in code, git, or scratch — not memory:

  • Code patterns, architecture, file paths derivable from the project
  • Git history or who-changed-what (use git log / git blame)
  • Bug-fix recipes — the fix lives in the commit
  • Anything already in CLAUDE.md
  • Ephemeral task state (use TodoWrite or a plan instead)

Even when the user says "remember this PR list" — ask what was surprising about it. The surprise is the memory. The list is not.

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

  • Save-everything spam — memory becomes noise; future-you ignores it
  • Skipping the "Why" — rule without reason becomes dogma or gets discarded
  • Duplicate entries — check existing memories before writing a new one
  • Cargo-culting from one session — confirmed-twice beats said-once for behavioral rules
  • Trusting stale memory — always verify file/symbol/state before acting on a recalled claim

Output Format

When you decide to save:

[LearnLoop] Saving as <type>: <one-line summary>
  → memory/<slug>.md
  → MEMORY.md updated

When you decide not to save:

[LearnLoop] Noted but not saved — <reason>

Be visible about the loop. Silent saves hide the mechanism; users should see what you remembered and what you didn't.

Pairs Well With

LearnLoop is part of the ThinkStack — meta-skills that compound:

  • clarity-first — understand the request before you act
  • thinkdeep — reason through complex problems
  • honest-critic — push back instead of validating
  • task-pilot — execute structured plans
  • learnloop — never lose what you learned
openclaw install learnloop
openclaw install honest-critic
openclaw install thinkdeep
openclaw install clarity-first
openclaw install task-pilot

版本历史

共 1 个版本

  • v1.0.0 当前
    2026-05-21 15:20 安全 安全

安全检测

腾讯云安全 (Keen)

安全,无风险
查看报告

腾讯云安全 (Sanbu)

安全,无风险
查看报告

🔗 相关推荐

ai-agent

self-improving agent

pskoett
记录自身发现以实现自我改进的技能
★ 4,174 📥 944,596
ai-agent

Agent Browser

rez0
用于 AI 代理的浏览器自动化 CLI。当用户需要与网站交互(包括浏览页面、填写表单、点击按钮、截图等)时使用。
★ 872 📥 350,011
ai-agent

Find Skills

root
帮助用户发现和安装智能体技能,当用户询问如「如何做X」、「找X的技能」、「有能做...的吗」等问题时
★ 1,526 📥 581,687