Facilitate a structured ICP workshop. Output is a versioned ICP document teams
can act on across sales, marketing, and growth.
(industry, size, stack, GTM model), what made them buy (trigger, champion, pain),
what outcome they got, why they stay.
recurring patterns → defines Negative ICP.
size band, data/tech maturity, GTM motion fit (PLG vs sales-led).
Technical Champion (evaluates), End User (daily use), Blocker (can kill deal).
What firmographic attributes = high Fit? What behavioral signals = high Intent?
Use the gtm-qualification-scoring skill for the full FIRE rubric.
ICP v[X] · [Company] · [Date]
Segment [#]: [Name]
Who: [1–2 sentences]
Firmographics: industry · size · geography · business model
Stack signals: [tools or tech patterns indicating fit]
Trigger events: [what makes them enter the market]
Buying committee: Economic Buyer / Champion / End User / Blocker
Why they buy: [pain + outcome]
ACV range / sales cycle: [estimate]
Negative ICP:
- [Characteristic] → [why it's a bad fit]
FIRE scoring criteria for this segment:
- Fit: [high-signal markers]
- Intent: [specific triggers]
- Recency: [timeframe threshold]
- Engagement: [interaction types that count]
Flag any segment not grounded in real customers as `[Hypothesis — validate with
first 10 customers]`. Version the document and recommend revisiting every 6 months.
共 1 个版本