← 返回
未分类 中文

find-bugs

Find bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code quality issues in local branch changes. Use when asked to review changes, find bugs, security review, or audit...
在本地分支变更中查找缺陷、安全漏洞和代码质量问题。用于审查变更、查找错误、安全审查或审计。
wu-uk wu-uk 来源
未分类 clawhub v0.1.0 1 版本 100000 Key: 无需
★ 0
Stars
📥 297
下载
💾 0
安装
1
版本
#latest

概述

Find Bugs

Review changes on this branch for bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code quality issues.

Phase 1: Complete Input Gathering

  1. Get the FULL diff: git diff master...HEAD
  2. If output is truncated, read each changed file individually until you have seen every changed line
  3. List all files modified in this branch before proceeding

Phase 2: Attack Surface Mapping

For each changed file, identify and list:

  • All user inputs (request params, headers, body, URL components)
  • All database queries
  • All authentication/authorization checks
  • All session/state operations
  • All external calls
  • All cryptographic operations

Phase 3: Security Checklist (check EVERY item for EVERY file)

  • [ ] Injection: SQL, command, template, header injection
  • [ ] XSS: All outputs in templates properly escaped?
  • [ ] Authentication: Auth checks on all protected operations?
  • [ ] Authorization/IDOR: Access control verified, not just auth?
  • [ ] CSRF: State-changing operations protected?
  • [ ] Race conditions: TOCTOU in any read-then-write patterns?
  • [ ] Session: Fixation, expiration, secure flags?
  • [ ] Cryptography: Secure random, proper algorithms, no secrets in logs?
  • [ ] Information disclosure: Error messages, logs, timing attacks?
  • [ ] DoS: Unbounded operations, missing rate limits, resource exhaustion?
  • [ ] Business logic: Edge cases, state machine violations, numeric overflow?

Phase 4: Verification

For each potential issue:

  • Check if it's already handled elsewhere in the changed code
  • Search for existing tests covering the scenario
  • Read surrounding context to verify the issue is real

Phase 5: Pre-Conclusion Audit

Before finalizing, you MUST:

  1. List every file you reviewed and confirm you read it completely
  2. List every checklist item and note whether you found issues or confirmed it's clean
  3. List any areas you could NOT fully verify and why
  4. Only then provide your final findings

Output Format

Prioritize: security vulnerabilities > bugs > code quality

Skip: stylistic/formatting issues

For each issue:

  • File:Line - Brief description
  • Severity: Critical/High/Medium/Low
  • Problem: What's wrong
  • Evidence: Why this is real (not already fixed, no existing test, etc.)
  • Fix: Concrete suggestion
  • References: OWASP, RFCs, or other standards if applicable

If you find nothing significant, say so - don't invent issues.

Do not make changes - just report findings. I'll decide what to address.

版本历史

共 1 个版本

  • v0.1.0 当前
    2026-05-07 23:25 安全 安全

安全检测

腾讯云安全 (Keen)

安全,无风险
查看报告

腾讯云安全 (Sanbu)

安全,无风险
查看报告

🔗 相关推荐

office-efficiency

xlsx

wu-uk
全面的电子表格创建、编辑与分析,支持公式、格式化、数据分析和可视化。当Claude需要工作时...
★ 1 📥 1,357
dev-programming

Github

steipete
使用 `gh` CLI 与 GitHub 交互,通过 `gh issue`、`gh pr`、`gh run` 和 `gh api` 管理议题、PR、CI 运行及高级查询。
★ 686 📥 331,209
dev-programming

Mcporter

steipete
使用 mcporter CLI 直接列出、配置、认证及调用 MCP 服务器/工具(支持 HTTP 或 stdio),涵盖临时服务器、配置编辑及 CLI/类型生成功能。
★ 198 📥 68,250