← 返回
未分类

Fast Fact-Check

Fast, source-backed answer to a factual question — a technology, a term/noun, a date/version/value, or a "is it true that…" claim. Triage the question simple...
快速提供有据可查的事实性问题答案,涵盖技术、术语、日期/版本/数值或“是否属实”等断言,简化问题分类。
vincentjiang06 vincentjiang06 来源
未分类 clawhub v0.1.0 1 版本 100000 Key: 无需
★ 0
Stars
📥 89
下载
💾 1
安装
1
版本
#latest

概述

fact-check

Answer a factual question fast and sourced. The whole flow is time-boxed:

simple ≤2 min, complex ≤5 min. Speed comes from four levers — triage the

effort, search in parallel, read snippets before fetching, and **stop the

moment the answer is corroborated**. Never rabbit-hole; never exceed the tier

budget; never emit an uncited or confident-but-unverified claim.

> If the request is for a comprehensive / exhaustive multi-source report, this

> is the wrong skill — defer to deep-research. This skill returns a bounded,

> bottom-line answer, not a report.

Steps

0 — Preflight. Restate the question in one line; extract the precise

claim/entity to verify. If it is subjective/opinion or answerable without the web,

stop and say so (don't fabricate a "fact").

1 — Triage → budget. Load rules/triage.md. Decide simple vs complex

(when genuinely unsure, or the topic is contested, treat as complex) and adopt that

tier's budget: rounds, parallel width, fetch cap, source bar, time target.

2 — Round 1: parallel search. Load rules/search-protocol.md. Decompose the

question into angles and issue the tier's searches as **parallel tool calls in a

single message — never one at a time. Read result snippets first**.

3 — Corroborate & early-exit. WebFetch a full page only when a snippet is

insufficient or a number/quote must be verified (≤ the tier's fetch cap). The

moment the bottom line is corroborated to the tier's source bar, **stop

searching** and go to Step 5.

4 — One more round (complex only). If still under-corroborated or sources

conflict and a round remains, run one targeted round to fill the specific gap or

triangulate the conflict. Still short → declare uncertain.

5 — Synthesize the answer. Load rules/output-contract.md and fill

assets/answer-template.md: a one-line Answer up front, a Confidence label

(High/Medium/Low), the Tier, 2–4 cited evidence bullets, a numbered Sources

list, and Caveats only if needed. Every load-bearing claim carries a citation.

6 — Self-check, then emit. Verify against the contract; optionally run

node scripts/check_answer.mjs to confirm the structure (every [n]

resolves, confidence set, per-tier source bar met). Emit; stop — do not exceed

the budget.

Controls (hard, externalized in rules/triage.md)

  • Time/effort budget per tier — simple: ≤2 min, 1 round, width 1–3, ≤1 fetch,

≥1 source. complex: ≤5 min, ≤2 rounds, width 3–5, ≤3 fetch, ≥2 independent

sources. When a cap is hit, stop and report at current confidence.

  • Citation — every load-bearing claim cites a source; uncorroborated → Low

confidence / "could not confirm", never fabricated.

  • Speed-safety — speed must not produce confident-wrong; below the source bar →

explicit uncertainty, not a guessed High-confidence answer.

Modules

FileWhen to load
------------
rules/triage.mdStep 1 — simple/complex rubric + the per-tier budget table + the uncertain path.
rules/search-protocol.mdStep 2–4 — query decomposition, parallel fan-out, snippet-first, early-exit on saturation, conflict triangulation, claim→evidence.
rules/output-contract.mdStep 5–6 — the BLUF format, confidence labels, citation rules, the self-check.
references/source-reliability.mdWhen grading sources or a fact is volatile (freshness / as-of date).
references/metrics.mdWhen measuring the skill (speed, traceability, confident-wrong rate).

Scripts

FileUsage
------------
scripts/check_answer.mjsnode scripts/check_answer.mjs — deterministic answer-contract validator (BLUF, confidence, tier, citation resolution, per-tier source bar). The release gate + optional Step-6 self-check.

Assets

FileUsage
------------
assets/answer-template.mdThe fill-in answer skeleton (Answer / Confidence / Tier / Key evidence / Sources / Caveats).

版本历史

共 1 个版本

  • v0.1.0 当前
    2026-06-07 06:45

安全检测

腾讯云安全 (Keen)

队列中

腾讯云安全 (Sanbu)

队列中

🔗 相关推荐

knowledge-management

Summarize

paudyyin
智能摘要工具,自动为长文本、文档、网页生成摘要,提取要点与关键词,支持自定义摘要长度。
★ 958 📥 518,764
knowledge-management

Obsidian

steipete
操作 Obsidian 仓库(纯 Markdown 笔记)并通过 obsidian-cli 自动化。
★ 446 📥 104,963
education

Course Study

vincentjiang06
将课程的教材(PDF幻灯片、粘贴的主题列表或仅课程名称)转化为全覆盖、费曼式解释、备考复习笔记。三角...
★ 2 📥 1,223