← 返回
未分类 中文

Elixir Docs Review

Reviews Elixir documentation for completeness, quality, and ExDoc best practices. Use when auditing @moduledoc, @doc, @spec coverage, doctest correctness, an...
审查 Elixir 文档的完整性、质量及 ExDoc最佳实践;在审计 @moduledoc、@doc、@spec 覆盖率、doctest 正确性等时使用。
anderskev
未分类 clawhub v1.2.1 2 版本 100000 Key: 无需
★ 0
Stars
📥 410
下载
💾 1
安装
2
版本
#latest

概述

Elixir Documentation Review

Quick Reference

Issue TypeReference
-----------------------
@moduledoc, @doc quality, anti-patternsreferences/doc-quality.md
@spec, @type, @typedoc coveragereferences/spec-coverage.md

Review Checklist

Module Documentation

  • [ ] All public modules have @moduledoc
  • [ ] First-line summary is concise (one line, used by tools as summary)
  • [ ] @moduledoc includes ## Examples where appropriate
  • [ ] @moduledoc false only on internal/implementation modules

Function Documentation

  • [ ] All public functions have @doc
  • [ ] All public functions have @spec
  • [ ] @doc describes return values clearly
  • [ ] Multi-clause functions documented before first clause
  • [ ] Function head declared when arg names need clarification

Doctests

  • [ ] Doctests present for pure, deterministic functions
  • [ ] No doctests for side-effectful operations (DB, HTTP, etc.)
  • [ ] Doctests actually run (module included in test file)

Cross-References

  • [ ] Module references use backtick auto-linking (MyModule)
  • [ ] Function refs use proper arity format (function/2)
  • [ ] Type refs use t: prefix (t:typename/0)
  • [ ] No plain-text references where auto-links are possible

Metadata

  • [ ] @since annotations on new public API additions
  • [ ] @deprecated with migration guidance where appropriate

Valid Patterns (Do NOT Flag)

  • @doc false on callback implementations - Documented at behaviour level
  • @doc false on protocol implementations - Protocol docs cover the intent
  • Missing @spec on private functions - @spec optional for internals
  • Short @moduledoc without ## Examples on simple utility modules - Not every module needs examples
  • Using @impl true without separate @doc - Inherits documentation from behaviour

Context-Sensitive Rules

IssueFlag ONLY IF
---------------------
Missing @moduledocModule is public AND not a protocol impl
Missing @specFunction is public AND exported
Missing doctestsFunction is pure AND deterministic
Generic @docDoc restates function name without adding value

Gates (sequenced — do not skip)

Work in order. Do not draft or ship a finding until the prior step passes.

  1. Scope lockPass when: You listed the exact .ex/.exs file paths (or Module names) under review; no vague “the project” scope.
  2. Full-context readPass when: For each candidate issue, you read the full surrounding definition (all clauses for multi-clause functions; full @moduledoc block for module-level claims), not only a diff hunk or search snippet.
  3. Evidence bundlePass when: Every draft finding uses the [FILE:LINE] ISSUE_TITLE header (line range allowed) and includes a verbatim quote or pointer to the @doc / @spec / doctest text in question. Module.function/arity may appear as supporting context but does not replace the [FILE:LINE] anchor. For “doctest fails” claims, Pass when: you cite mix test output for the relevant file or line, or the exact error string.
  4. Protocol before reportPass when: You loaded and followed review-verification-protocol (its Pre-Report checklist) before finalizing the issue list—not after.

When to Load References

  • Reviewing @moduledoc or @doc quality, seeing anti-patterns -> doc-quality.md
  • Reviewing @spec, @type, or @typedoc coverage -> spec-coverage.md

版本历史

共 2 个版本

  • v1.2.1 当前
    2026-05-03 07:34 安全 安全
  • v1.2.0
    2026-03-31 03:12 安全 安全

安全检测

腾讯云安全 (Keen)

安全,无风险
查看报告

腾讯云安全 (Sanbu)

安全,无风险
查看报告

🔗 相关推荐

Rust Code Review

anderskev
审查 Rust 代码,涵盖所有权、借用、生命周期、错误处理、trait 设计、unsafe 使用及常见错误,适用于 .rs 文件审查,检查...
★ 0 📥 752

Vitest Testing

anderskev
Vitest 测试框架模式与最佳实践。适用于编写单元测试、集成测试、配置 vitest.config、使用 vi.mock/vi.fn 进行模拟等...
★ 0 📥 912

Review Verification Protocol

anderskev
在报告任何代码审查结果前,必须先加载此技能,执行所有代码审查的强制验证步骤,以降低误报。
★ 0 📥 725