← 返回
效率工具 中文

Decision Distiller

Distill decision contexts, options, trade-offs, and outcomes into structured decision records. Use when the user is facing a choice, has made a decision they...
将决策背景、选项、权衡及结果提炼为结构化决策记录。适用于用户面临选择或已做出决策时。
harrylabsj
效率工具 clawhub v1.0.0 1 版本 100000 Key: 无需
★ 0
Stars
📥 386
下载
💾 4
安装
1
版本
#latest

概述

Decision Distiller

Overview

Decision Distiller helps capture, structure, and learn from decisions made during OpenClaw sessions. It transforms informal decision-making into documented, reviewable records that build organizational knowledge over time.

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • A user is weighing multiple options and needs clarity
  • A decision has been made and should be documented
  • Past decisions need review or analysis
  • Decision patterns across sessions should be identified
  • The user asks to "document this decision" or "record why we chose X"

Core Concepts

Decision Record

A structured document capturing:

  • Context: Situation requiring a decision
  • Options: Alternatives considered
  • Criteria: How options were evaluated
  • Decision: The choice made
  • Rationale: Why this choice was made
  • Trade-offs: What was gained/lost
  • Outcome: Result of the decision (filled later)
  • Lessons: What was learned

Decision Status

  • pending: Decision not yet made
  • decided: Decision made, awaiting outcome
  • validated: Decision proven correct
  • revised: Decision changed based on new information
  • archived: Decision no longer relevant

Input

Accepts decision information in various forms:

  • Conversation about options
  • Pros/cons lists
  • Direct statements of choice
  • Retrospective analysis

Output

Produces:

  • Dated decision records (Markdown)
  • Decision summaries
  • Pattern analysis across decisions
  • Decision status reports

Workflow

Capturing a New Decision

  1. Identify Context
    • What situation required a decision?
    • What was at stake?
    • Who was involved?
  1. List Options
    • What alternatives were considered?
    • What was eliminated early?
    • What made it to final consideration?
  1. Define Criteria
    • How were options evaluated?
    • What mattered most?
    • Were there constraints?
  1. Record Decision
    • What was chosen?
    • When was it decided?
    • Who decided?
  1. Document Rationale
    • Why was this option selected?
    • What tipped the balance?
    • What assumptions were made?
  1. Note Trade-offs
    • What was sacrificed?
    • What risks were accepted?
    • What opportunities were passed?

Reviewing Past Decisions

  1. Gather Records
    • Collect relevant decision records
    • Filter by topic, date, or status
  1. Analyze Patterns
    • Common criteria used
    • Recurring trade-offs
    • Typical decision timelines
  1. Extract Lessons
    • What worked well?
    • What would change?
    • What patterns emerge?

Output Format

Decision Record

# Decision: [Title] - YYYY-MM-DD

**ID**: DEC-2024-001
**Status**: decided
**Decided By**: [Name/Role]
**Date**: YYYY-MM-DD

## Context
[Description of the situation requiring a decision]

## Options Considered

### Option 1: [Name]
- **Description**: 
- **Pros**: 
- **Cons**: 
- **Estimated Impact**: 

### Option 2: [Name]
- **Description**: 
- **Pros**: 
- **Cons**: 
- **Estimated Impact**: 

## Decision Criteria
1. [Criterion 1] - Weight: High/Medium/Low
2. [Criterion 2] - Weight: High/Medium/Low

## Decision
**Chosen**: [Option X]

## Rationale
[Why this option was selected over others]

## Trade-offs
- **Accepted**: [What we gave up]
- **Mitigated**: [How we reduced risks]

## Expected Outcome
[What we expect to happen]

## Actual Outcome
[Filled in later - what actually happened]

## Lessons Learned
[Filled in later - insights from the outcome]

## Related Decisions
- [Link to related decision]

Commands

Create Decision Record

decision create "Decision title" --status pending

Update Decision

decision update DEC-2024-001 --status validated

List Decisions

decision list --status decided --since 2024-01-01

Analyze Patterns

decision analyze --topic architecture

Quality Rules

  • Be specific: vague decisions teach no lessons
  • Include alternatives: decisions without options aren't decisions
  • Document rationale: future you needs to know why
  • Review outcomes: a decision isn't complete until its outcome is known
  • Link related decisions: build decision networks

Good Trigger Examples

  • "Document this decision: we're going with X"
  • "Help me decide between A and B"
  • "What decisions have we made about architecture?"
  • "Review our deployment decisions from last month"
  • "I decided to use Y instead of Z, record that"

Resources

references/

  • references/decision-templates.md: Variations for different decision types
  • references/analysis-frameworks.md: Tools for analyzing decisions

版本历史

共 1 个版本

  • v1.0.0 当前
    2026-03-30 04:43 安全 安全

安全检测

腾讯云安全 (Keen)

安全,无风险
查看报告

腾讯云安全 (Sanbu)

安全,无风险
查看报告

🔗 相关推荐

productivity

Weather

steipete
获取当前天气和预报(无需API密钥)
★ 446 📥 226,454
productivity

Word / DOCX

ivangdavila
创建、检查和编辑 Microsoft Word 文档及 DOCX 文件,支持样式、编号、修订记录、表格、分节符及兼容性检查等功能。
★ 440 📥 148,113
productivity

Nano Pdf

steipete
使用nano-pdf CLI通过自然语言指令编辑PDF
★ 275 📥 114,962