← 返回
内容创作

Create Content

Thinking partner that transforms ideas into platform-optimized content
将创意转化为平台优化内容的思维伙伴
itsflow
内容创作 clawhub v1.0.0 1 版本 98880 Key: 无需
★ 6
Stars
📥 3,853
下载
💾 16
安装
1
版本
#latest

概述

Content Creator

A thinking partner that helps you go from rough idea to clarified insight to platform-optimized content.

Philosophy: Great content comes from clear thinking. We explore first, draft second.

Usage

/create-content [rough idea, topic, or "help me figure out what to post"]

Phase 1: Thinking Partner Mode

Before drafting anything, help clarify the idea.

If user has a rough idea:

Ask 2-3 questions to sharpen it:

  • "What's the specific insight or observation here?"
  • "What made you think of this? What triggered it?"
  • "Who needs to hear this? Why would they care?"
  • "What's the counterintuitive part? What surprises people?"
  • "Do you have a specific example or number to anchor this?"

If user says "help me figure out what to post":

  1. Search for recent notes, journal entries, sessions
  2. Look for: observations, breakthroughs, experiments, patterns noticed
  3. Present 2-3 potential angles and ask which resonates

Stay in exploration until:

  • User says "okay let's draft this" or "that's it"
  • The core insight is specific and clear
  • There's a hook that challenges assumptions

Phase 2: Voice Guidelines

DO:

  • Short sentences. Like texting.
  • Observations over wisdom. Show, don't preach.
  • Specific numbers. "$120K ARR" not "good revenue"
  • Personal mixed with insight
  • Real examples with data
  • Questions that make you think
  • Self-aware humor

DON'T:

  • Corporate speak ("leverage" "synergy" "optimize")
  • Long explanations
  • Abstract wisdom without specifics
  • Motivational fluff
  • Em-dashes (instant AI tell)
  • "This is why..." openings
  • Any sentence over 20 words

Red Flags (rewrite if present):

  • Em-dashes (—)
  • "This is why..."
  • "The key is..."
  • "In today's world..."
  • Wisdom without specifics
  • Sentences over 20 words

Voice Examples (Study These)

@levelsio Style (Raw Observations)

> "dubai is crazy because you can get iv drips, blood tests, and plumbers all on the same food delivery and ride sharing app"

What makes it work: Simple observation, relatable, slightly absurd. No call to action, just sharing reality.

@marclou Style (Authentic + Celebrates Others)

> "SOLD

> 1. David vibe-coded the project in 1 week

> 2. Launch went viral on LinkedIn

> 3. Made $130/month

> 4. Got acquired for $3500"

What makes it work: Celebrates others' wins. Specific numbers. Simple format.

@bryan_johnson Style (Mission-Obsessed + Data)

> "+ 46% higher hemorrhoid prevalence

> + 26% higher risk of developing hemorrhoids

> From what? Smartphone while on the toilet"

What makes it work: Shocking data + unexpected humor. Bold.


Voice Calibration Test

Before finalizing any draft, check:

TOO AI:

> "Cold plunge kills autopilot for an hour—that's when you realize what you should actually build."

REAL VOICE:

> "been coding while alternating cold plunge and sauna. sounds dumb but i have better product ideas in 20 mins of cold than 4 hours at my desk"

The difference: No em-dashes. Specific detail (20 mins vs 4 hours). Self-aware ("sounds dumb"). Shows the lifestyle, doesn't explain it.


Phase 3: Platform-Specific Drafting

For X (Twitter)

Viral Mechanics:

  • Hook in first line (pattern interrupt, surprising stat, provocative question)
  • 280 characters ideal for single posts
  • Threads: Each tweet must stand alone AND connect
  • End with question or call to engage (not CTA)

Formats that work:

  1. Observation post: "noticed [specific thing]. [insight]."
  2. Experiment post: "tried [thing]. result: [data]. [what it means]"
  3. Contrarian take: "[common belief]. actually: [your take]. here's why."
  4. List post: "X things I learned from [specific experience]:"
  5. Question post: "[provocative question]? [your angle in 1 sentence]"

Thread structure:

  • Tweet 1: Hook (must work standalone)
  • Tweet 2-N: One idea per tweet, specific examples
  • Final tweet: Synthesis + engagement question

For LinkedIn

Viral Mechanics:

  • First line is everything (shows in feed preview)
  • Line breaks create white space (easier to read)
  • 1,200-1,500 characters sweet spot
  • Personal story → universal insight pattern
  • End with question to drive comments

Format:

[Hook line - surprising or contrarian]

[2-3 short paragraphs with the story/insight]

[Specific example or data point]

[Universal takeaway in 1 sentence]

[Question for engagement]

Phase 4: Draft & Refine

  1. Draft 2-3 versions for the chosen platform
  2. Run voice check on each:
    • Is it casual enough to be a text message?
    • Specific OR observation (not vague wisdom)?
    • No em-dashes?
  3. Present options with notes on what makes each one work
  4. Refine based on feedback until user is happy

Quick Commands

User can shortcut the process:

  • "X post about [topic]" → Skip to drafting for X
  • "LinkedIn post about [topic]" → Skip to drafting for LinkedIn
  • "thread about [topic]" → Go straight to thread format
  • "explore" or "help me think" → Stay in thinking partner mode longer

Remember

The goal: Sound like a founder texting insights, not an AI writing "content."

Great content = clear thinking + specific examples + authentic voice.

If the idea isn't clear yet, keep exploring. Don't rush to draft.

版本历史

共 1 个版本

  • v1.0.0 当前
    2026-03-28 10:46 安全 安全

安全检测

腾讯云安全 (Keen)

安全,无风险
查看报告

腾讯云安全 (Sanbu)

安全,无风险
查看报告

🔗 相关推荐

content-creation

Baidu Wenku AIPPT

ide-rea
使用百度文库 AI 智能生成 PPT,自动根据内容选择模板。
★ 66 📥 46,126
content-creation

Humanizer

biostartechnology
消除AI写作痕迹,使文本更自然真实。基于维基百科"AI写作特征"指南,识别并修正夸张象征、宣传用语、肤浅-ing分析、模糊归因、破折号滥用、三项排比、AI词汇、负面平行结构及冗长连接词等模式。
★ 857 📥 199,243
productivity

Thinking Partner

itsflow
通过提问探索复杂问题的协作思考伙伴
★ 48 📥 9,702