← 返回
未分类 中文

Authentication

Proving identity: sessions, tokens, MFA, recovery. Use when implementing login, token refresh, or auth bugs.
身份验证:会话、令牌、MFA、恢复。用于实现登录、令牌刷新或身份验证bug。
codenova58 codenova58 来源
未分类 clawhub v1.0.0 1 版本 100000 Key: 无需
★ 0
Stars
📥 530
下载
💾 1
安装
1
版本
#latest

概述

Authentication Skill

This skill provides structured guidance for Authentication work. Act as an active guide: confirm triggers, propose the stages below, and adapt if the user wants a lighter pass.

When to Offer This Workflow

Trigger conditions:

  • User mentions authentication or closely related work
  • They want a structured workflow rather than ad-hoc tips
  • They are preparing a review, rollout, or stakeholder communication

Initial offer:

Explain the four stages briefly and ask whether to follow this workflow or work freeform. If they decline, continue in their preferred style.

Workflow Stages

Stage 1: Clarify context & goals

Anchor on threat model: sessions vs tokens. Ask what success looks like, constraints, and what must not break. Capture unknowns early.

Stage 2: Design or plan the approach

Translate goals into a concrete plan around passwords, MFA, and recovery. Compare alternatives and explicit trade-offs; avoid implicit assumptions.

Stage 3: Implement, validate, and harden

Execute with verification loops tied to token lifetime and refresh. Prefer small steps, measurable checks, and rollback points where risk is high.

Stage 4: Operate, communicate, and iterate

Close the loop with logging, lockout, and abuse: monitoring, documentation, stakeholder updates, and lessons learned for the next cycle.

Checklist Before Completion

  • Goals and constraints are explicit for Authentication Skill
  • Risks and trade-offs are stated, not hand-waved
  • Verification steps match the change’s impact (tests, canary, peer review)
  • Operational follow-through is covered (monitoring, docs, owners)

Tips for Effective Guidance

  • Be procedural: stage-by-stage, with clear exit criteria
  • Ask for missing context (environment, scale, deadlines) before prescribing
  • Prefer checklists and concrete examples over generic platitudes
  • If the user declines the workflow, switch to freeform help without lecturing

Handling Deviations

  • If the user wants to skip a stage: confirm and continue with what they need.
  • If context is missing: ask targeted questions before strong recommendations.
  • Prefer concrete examples, trade-offs, and verification steps over generic advice.

Quality Bar

  • Each recommendation should be actionable (what to do next).
  • Call out failure modes relevant to Authentication (security, scale, UX, or ops).
  • Keep tone direct and respectful of the user’s time.

版本历史

共 1 个版本

  • v1.0.0 当前
    2026-05-03 05:39 安全 安全

安全检测

腾讯云安全 (Keen)

安全,无风险
查看报告

腾讯云安全 (Sanbu)

安全,无风险
查看报告

🔗 相关推荐

professional

Eastmoney

codenova58
访问并总结来自东方财富的公开市场数据、新闻和行业趋势,不包括交易或批量数据提取。
★ 1 📥 6,011
dev-programming

Github

steipete
使用 `gh` CLI 与 GitHub 交互,通过 `gh issue`、`gh pr`、`gh run` 和 `gh api` 管理议题、PR、CI 运行及高级查询。
★ 679 📥 328,215
dev-programming

CodeConductor.ai

larsonreever
AI驱动平台,提供快速全栈开发、智能体、工作流自动化及低代码AI集成的可扩展产品创建。
★ 72 📥 182,095