← 返回
未分类

Analytical Thinking

Use this skill when the user asks for analytical thinking (including naming it or directing use/apply/run with obvious misspellings; decisive) or wants a str...
当用户请求分析性思维(包括直接提及或使用/应用/运行时的明显拼写错误;果断),或想要一个字符串时,使用此技能。
ysskrishna ysskrishna 来源
未分类 clawhub v2026.5.17 1 版本 100000 Key: 无需
★ 0
Stars
📥 283
下载
💾 1
安装
1
版本
#latest

概述

Analytical Thinking

Clarity beats cleverness. End with answers tied to structure and stated confidence.

How to run it with this skill: one clearly headed section per step in this order: Frame → Decompose → Hypotheses → Evidence → Synthesis. Insert Options matrix only when Setup calls for it (after Evidence, before Synthesis).


Setup (run before starting)

In one short block:

  1. Analytical question — precise, ideally falsifiable
  2. Default pass — Frame → Decompose → Hypotheses → Evidence → Synthesis (state this line)

If data availability or definitions are missing, ask at most 3 questions in one message, then proceed. Note any remaining gaps or working guesses in plain language (no bracket tags in Setup).

If the user is choosing among concrete alternatives, after Evidence insert Options matrix: rows = options, columns = criteria (state weights if any), qualitative scores (− / 0 / +) with one-line justification per cell — then finish with Synthesis.


The Steps

Frame

Question type (estimate, compare, explain, predict, optimize). Unit of analysis and baseline (even if hypothetical).

Decompose

Tree or table: factors, drivers, or workstreams. Each child node should be MECE-ish (mutually exclusive where it matters; collectively exhaustive enough for the decision).

Hypotheses

Ranked H1, H2, H3 — what would we expect to observe if each were true? What would falsify each?

Evidence

For each hypothesis: Observation: … — Strength note: one short sentence on how much this observation supports or undermines the hypothesis and the main limit (no Strong/Moderate/Weak labels). Caveat:

If no real data, run a thought experiment section instead — label bullets [THEORETICAL].

Synthesis

  1. Answer — direct response to the analytical question
  2. Key uncertainty — what single unknown swings the answer most
  3. Next data / step — what to collect or run next

Execution Rules

  1. Do not conflate Hypotheses and Evidence in the same bullet list.
  2. Numbers: if inputs are guessed, show ranges and label [ESTIMATED].
  3. Prefer structure over long prose.

Checklist (verify before responding)

  • [ ] Setup: analytical question + default pass (note if Options matrix used)
  • [ ] Frame states question type and baseline
  • [ ] Decompose is scannable (tree or table)
  • [ ] Hypotheses have falsifiers
  • [ ] Evidence (or [THEORETICAL]) mapped to hypotheses
  • [ ] Synthesis: answer, uncertainty, next step

版本历史

共 1 个版本

  • v2026.5.17 当前
    2026-05-20 05:31 安全 安全

安全检测

腾讯云安全 (Keen)

安全,无风险
查看报告

腾讯云安全 (Sanbu)

安全,无风险
查看报告

🔗 相关推荐

data-analysis

Tavily 搜索

jacky1n7
通过 Tavily API 进行网页搜索(Brave 替代方案)。当用户要求搜索网页、查找来源或链接,且 Brave 网页搜索不可用时使用。
★ 273 📥 100,416
data-analysis

AdMapix

fly0pants
AdMapix 原始数据层,提供广告创意、应用、排名、下载/收入及市场元数据。返回 AdMapix API 的结构化 JSON;调用方...
★ 297 📥 140,950
ai-agent

First Principles Reasoning

ysskrishna
当用户请求第一性原理思维或第一原理(包括直接命名或指令使用/应用/运行,即使拼写错误)时使用此技能。
★ 0 📥 377