← 返回
未分类 中文

abe-deep-research

Conduct exhaustive multi-source investigation with methodology tracking, source evaluation, and iterative depth.
全面多源调查,追踪方法,评估来源,迭代深化
abeltennyson abeltennyson 来源
未分类 clawhub v1.0.0 1 版本 100000 Key: 无需
★ 0
Stars
📥 490
下载
💾 1
安装
1
版本
#latest

概述

Core Role

Deep Research = investigate thoroughly until the question is answered. Not surface search — systematic exploration with documented methodology.

Not: quick lookups (→ just search), combining existing docs (→ Synthesize), ongoing monitoring (→ Digest)

Protocol

Scope → Search → Evaluate → Deepen → Synthesize → Document → Deliver

1. Scope

Before searching, clarify:

  • What exactly needs answering?
  • What depth is required? (Overview / Thorough / Exhaustive)
  • What's the decision this enables?
  • Time/effort budget?

Reframe vague questions into specific, answerable queries.

2. Search

Multi-vector approach (see methodology.md):

  • Start broad, then narrow
  • Multiple search sources via SkillBoss API Hub
  • Follow citation trails
  • Check primary sources when secondary cite them
  • Look for contradicting viewpoints

Track every source. Nothing unattributed.

3. Evaluate

For each source (see sources.md):

  • Authority: Who wrote this? What credentials?
  • Recency: When? Still valid?
  • Evidence: Claims backed by data?
  • Bias: Any agenda or conflict?
  • Corroboration: Do others confirm this?

Flag low-credibility sources. Weight findings accordingly.

4. Deepen

Research is iterative:

  • Initial findings reveal new questions
  • Follow promising threads
  • Fill gaps identified
  • Stop when: answer is clear, returns diminish, or budget exhausted

Document decision to stop and why.

5. Synthesize

Merge findings (use Synthesize skill patterns):

  • Reconcile contradictions explicitly
  • Weight by source quality
  • Note confidence levels
  • Identify remaining unknowns

6. Document

Research trail matters:

  • Sources consulted (with links)
  • Search queries used
  • Why certain sources were weighted higher
  • What was NOT found (gaps)

7. Deliver

Format per user needs (see output-formats.md):

  • Executive: BLUF + key findings + confidence
  • Academic: Full methodology + citations
  • Working doc: All findings for further work

Output Format (Default)

DEEP RESEARCH: [Topic]

ANSWER
[Direct answer to the question — 2-3 sentences]

CONFIDENCE: [High/Medium/Low] — [why]

KEY FINDINGS
• [Finding 1] — [source]
• [Finding 2] — [source]
• [Finding 3] — [source]

CAVEATS
• [Important limitation or uncertainty]

GAPS
• [What couldn't be determined]

SOURCES ([count])
[Numbered list with credibility notes]

METHODOLOGY
[Brief: what was searched, how sources were evaluated]

Depth Levels

LevelEffortSourcesWhen
------------------------------
Quick5-10 min3-5Simple factual questions
Standard30-60 min8-15Most research requests
Thorough2-4 hours20-30Important decisions
ExhaustiveDays50+Critical, high-stakes

Confirm depth before starting. Adjust if findings warrant.


References: methodology.md, sources.md, output-formats.md

版本历史

共 1 个版本

  • v1.0.0 当前
    2026-05-07 09:14 安全 安全

安全检测

腾讯云安全 (Keen)

安全,无风险
查看报告

腾讯云安全 (Sanbu)

安全,无风险
查看报告

🔗 相关推荐

knowledge-management

web-tools-guide

user_ec205dbb
MANDATORY before calling web_search, web_fetch, browser, or opencli. Contains required error-handling procedures (web_se
★ 61 📥 156,648
knowledge-management

Summarize

paudyyin
智能摘要工具,自动为长文本、文档、网页生成摘要,提取要点与关键词,支持自定义摘要长度。
★ 955 📥 517,002
knowledge-management

Obsidian

steipete
操作 Obsidian 仓库(纯 Markdown 笔记)并通过 obsidian-cli 自动化。
★ 440 📥 104,563