🚨🇺🇸司法部公布了3万页爱泼斯坦案卷宗——并提前为特朗普聘请了律师美国司法部刚刚公布了近 3 万页与爱泼斯坦有关的文件——并且在任何人打开这些 PDF 文件之前就做了一件不同寻常的事情。他们发出了警告。这份文件中隐藏着一些“不实且耸人听闻”的指控，这些指控涉及特朗普，是在 2020 年大选前不久提交给联邦调查局的。美国司法部的立场很明确：毫无根据、虚假、不可信。他们的逻辑更加冷酷——如果这些说法属实，早就被利用了。他们在谈论什么？这些并非新的爆料或宣誓证词。这些都是未经请求的线索、电子邮件和公民投稿——与选举周期中充斥联邦政府邮箱的恶意信件、出于政治动机的指控和二手故事属于同一类别。有人指控行为不当，也有人暗示关系密切或知情。但这些指控都缺乏足够的证据，不足以提起诉讼、发出传票或启动调查。这很重要。文件显示的是收据，而非验证信息。联邦调查局已记录在案，司法部已存档。之后没有任何证据证实此事。这就是为什么它们一直处于沉寂状态——直到信息透明法迫使它们重见天日。放眼全局：这份报告并非只关乎特朗普一人。它揭示了爱泼斯坦案如何演变成谣言、恐惧和投机主义的温床。真实的罪行，真实的受害者，以及围绕真相的数千页噪音。预测：社交媒体会断章取义地挑选最丑陋的言论，并将其作为证据。法院不会。历史学家会注意到其中的蹊跷之处——指控的内容，以及司法部如何积极地暗示不存在的内容。在文件泄露泛滥的时代，这纯粹是危机公关，因为任何文件都会泄露，但并非所有泄露的内容都具有实际意义。来源：美国司法部🚨🇺🇸 DOJ DROPS 30,000 MORE EPSTEIN PAGES - AND PREEMPTIVELY LAWYERS UP FOR TRUMPThe Justice Department just dumped nearly 30,000 additional pages of Epstein-related documents - and did something unusual before anyone even opened the PDFs.They issued a warning.Buried in the release are “untrue and sensationalist” claims involving Trump, submitted to the FBI shortly before the 2020 election. DOJ’s position is blunt: unfounded, false, no credibility. Their logic is colder - if these claims were real, they would’ve already been weaponized.So what are they talking about?These aren’t new revelations or sworn testimony. They’re unsolicited tips, emails, and citizen submissions - the same category as crank letters, politically motivated accusations, and third-hand stories that flood federal inboxes during election cycles. Some allege inappropriate behavior. Others imply proximity or knowledge. None are backed by evidence sufficient to trigger charges, subpoenas, or investigative escalation.That matters.The files show receipt, not validation. The FBI logged them. DOJ archived them. No corroboration followed. That’s why they sat dormant - until transparency laws forced daylight.Zoom out: this release isn’t about Trump alone. It’s about how the Epstein case metastasized into a gravity well for rumor, fear, and opportunism. Real crimes. Real victims. And thousands of pages of noise orbiting the truth.Prediction: social media will cherry-pick the ugliest lines and call it proof. Courts won’t. Historians will note the tell - what’s alleged, but how aggressively DOJ is signaling what isn’t there.This is pure damage control in a document dump era where everything leaks, but not everything means something.Source: DOJ
